Re: GnuTLS | Draft: fix mingw (!2076)

Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>


Daiki Ueno commented on a discussion on tests/name-constraints-ip.c: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2076#note_3123293024

 >  _gnutls_x509_name_constraints_merge(gnutls_x509_name_constraints_t nc,
 >  				    gnutls_x509_name_constraints_t nc2);
 >  
 > -static void check_for_error(int ret)
 > -{
 > -	if (ret != GNUTLS_E_SUCCESS)
 > -		fail_msg("error in %d: %s\n", __LINE__, gnutls_strerror(ret));
 > -}
 > +#define check_for_error(ret)                                    \

Ah, I see it's for `__LINE__`. IMO it's worth a comment (or a commit message) about the reason behind the change.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2076#note_3123293024
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. Unsubscribe from this thread: https://gitlab.com/-/sent_notifications/3-3sii4vb2ue3rvq4vf8mk1lemk/unsubscribe | Manage all notifications: https://gitlab.com/-/profile/notifications | Help: https://gitlab.com/help

_______________________________________________
Gnutls-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.