Re: Help, I'm confused (how to package cryptplug)

On Monday 19 April 2004 14:27, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:17:34 +0200, Michael Nottebrock said:
> > gpg-agent and gpgsm into the gnupg-1.9.x versions, the deprecation of
> > newpg and the recent updates to libgcrypt, all those programs have
> > become ever harder to sync.
>
> Frankly, I hope that things will get better now.  newpg used to be
> only a transitional package.
>
> > Can anybody tell me what is the recommended way to provide the crypto
> > plugins right now? Use the development branch of gnupg and
>
> For the old Kmail (the one using cryptplug), you definitely need to
> use gpgme-0.3.16.  This will still work with the old backend but is of
> paramount importance when using the new backend.

Just to make sure I'm getting this right: gnupg 1.9.x (== the backend?) can be 
built with both gpgme-0.3.16 (which I would need to do, since it's the gpgme 
version available in ports and I want to provide crypto plugins for the kmail 
in KDE_3_2_BRANCH) and gpgme-0.4.x?

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | [email protected]
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

_______________________________________________
Gpa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gpa-dev

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBAg8SsXhc68WspdLARAlFLAJsE4hq1vtFIEETQKkHduFAPUYJcOQCeM368
bzQW+BTTus9Iyl8V1j74rMQ=
=Gffi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----