Re: libassuan troubles
Michael Nottebrock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gpa.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 19 April 2004 16:34, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > This seems spurious. Maybe putc_unlocked is only defined as a macro > on BSD, and thus circumvents the autoconf tests? This would sound > broken to me (it may be allowed to define it as a macro, but it should > still be defined as a function in the library). Yes, it's a macro. However, I don't see what's wrong about that other than making autoconf's life harder. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [email protected] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org _______________________________________________ Gpa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gpa-dev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAg+guXhc68WspdLARAhHOAJ9AHQFJ1akFdwqjUtYj6EvqyN7s0gCfX19T GaFnWX4ZrVyha18v65WkZ9k= =D611 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----