Re: libassuan troubles
Michael Nottebrock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gpa.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 19 April 2004 17:15, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > At Mon, 19 Apr 2004 16:54:37 +0200, > > Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > [1 <text/plain; iso-8859-1 (quoted-printable)>] > > > > On Monday 19 April 2004 16:34, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > > This seems spurious. Maybe putc_unlocked is only defined as a macro > > > on BSD, and thus circumvents the autoconf tests? This would sound > > > broken to me (it may be allowed to define it as a macro, but it should > > > still be defined as a function in the library). > > > > Yes, it's a macro. However, I don't see what's wrong about that other > > than making autoconf's life harder. > > putc_unlocked is specified as a function that may be defined as a > macro. The fact that it is defined as a macro does not relief you > from also declaring and defining it as a function. It seems our standards guys agree and indeed FreeBSD 5 has putc_unlocked defined in libc and the autoconf check does work there, too, so only FreeBSD 4.x is affected. I'm not sure if that's still worth the trouble of adding a special case (in libassuan or autoconf). -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [email protected] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org _______________________________________________ Gpa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gpa-dev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAg/PuXhc68WspdLARAsqXAJ9kAfGuEcabaKOGlS49X1Obcdh9RQCfcY9m rZId9djTy3KzqKSfv4B/G2U= =+nJ0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----