Re: gpg agent difficulty
Bernhard Reiter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gpa.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 11:15:05AM +0200, Werner Koch wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:25:09 +0200, Ingo Klöcker said: > > > Yeah, and everybody (I'm talking about fellow KDE developers and not > > about users) apart from Marc (and probably a few others who know the > > secret incantation) seems to be unable to make KMail work with the new > > stuff. The old stuff OTOH still works perfectly for me and some other > > The gpg-agent from newpg has serious flaws and I really wonder how you > all can life with it. gnupg 1.9 is a replcement for newpg since > December and I can't remember any critical bugs reported then. I > assumed everyone is using that for a long time now. Maybe that is the problem then. We need more bug reports and also more usage. Ingo: What were the problems with gnupg1.9. in particular? Do we have them in the bugtracker already? _______________________________________________ Gpa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gpa-dev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBA+8R7h9ag3dpKERYRAnuvAJ9ATMvl4uvdlxbFBRR9MtiR2sm9MACgrcew d4NvxsxVGR22z7oz8pIAex4= =OGUC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----