Re: Proposal for uri for gnupg messages
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> Mon, 07 Sep 2015 23:11:48 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gpa.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============1014357379==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon 2015-08-31 04:13:47 -0400, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> @all, I think for lack of traffic (last post July 2012) we should
> remove this mailinglist [gpa-dev]. And redirect traffic to
> gnupg-devel@.
That sounds like a reasonable proposal to me.
--dkg
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=3bgh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
--===============1014357379==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Gpa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gpa-dev
--===============1014357379==--