Re: [PATCH] MPI helper of addition one limb, Least Leak Intended
Jussi Kivilinna <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.libgcrypt.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, On 2025-02-17 07:26, NIIBE Yutaka via Gcrypt-devel wrote: > Hello, Jussi, > > Jussi Kivilinna <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think this function could use 'add_ssaaaa' macro to handle addition >> with >> carry. >> >> Something like this (completely untested): >> >> cy = s2_limb; >> while ( s1_size ) >> { >> x = *s1_ptr; >> add_ssaaaa(cy, x, 0, cy, 0, x); >> *s1_ptr++ = x; >> s1_size--; >> } >> return cy; > > Good. I'm going to push this to master for _gcry_mpih_add_1_lli > function. > > Further, I'm goint to push the chnage for _gcry_mpih_add_lli > function as: Is LLI variant really needed? This looks the same as the _gcry_mpih_add_n. The assembly versions of this (for select architectures) should all be constant time. Well, looking at some of those implementations, they look overly complex and we carry assembly implementations for now old/obsolete architectures. I think we should remove obsolete ones in favor of just using the generic version. I'd just keep assembly for following architectures: - amd64 - i386 - aarch64 - arm - generic We could then validate that these really have constant time (or LLI) implementations. -Jussi > > mpi_limb_t > _gcry_mpih_add_lli (mpi_ptr_t wp, mpi_ptr_t up, mpi_ptr_t vp, > mpi_size_t usize) > { > mpi_size_t i; > mpi_limb_t cy; > > cy = 0; > for (i = 0; i < usize; i++) > { > mpi_limb_t u = up[i]; > mpi_limb_t v = vp[i]; > mpi_limb_t w; > > add_ssaaaa (cy, w, 0, u, 0, cy); > add_ssaaaa (cy, w, cy, w, 0, v); > wp[i] = w; > } > > return cy; > }