Re: Less Leaky ECDSA signature generation (in master)

On 3/26/25 19:06, NIIBE Yutaka via Gcrypt-devel wrote:
> [...]  For the first improvement,
> I realized that runtime checks in ec_mod and its friends could be leaky,
> because it depends on how small/big the value is.

Could these checks instead be improved to run in constant time?

> Since it is (or can be) precondition for those routines in the code of
> libgcrypt, it can be removed.  Since it could be leaky, it's good to be
> removed.

Hypothetically, if those preconditions are violated, what could go 
wrong?  How badly does the math fall apart?  Could an invalid result 
potentially (partially) expose the signing key?

Removing runtime checks in this type of code makes me nervous. Maybe it 
is just paranoia.


-- Jacob

_______________________________________________
Gcrypt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gcrypt-devel