Re: Less Leaky ECDSA signature generation (in master)

On 3/27/25 20:21, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> [...]
>
> Because we expose the lower level API, it is possible for an application
> to violate the preconditions, by supplying an ECC point with larger MPIs.
>
> By the violation of the preconditions, it used to result the call of
> log_bug (emitting a message and abort).  After the change of mine, it
> results wrong value, by using lower bits and ignoring upper bits.

Are the ignored upper bits definitely zero or could an application 
reasonably expect libgcrypt to do something useful with such a point 
(perhaps reducing a value between P and 2*P to its proper value mod P?)?

> [...]
>
> If we'd take an approach of more kindness, we could add the check for
> the external API to examine the field in ECC points for preconditions.

That is probably a good idea, along with making certain that the 
preconditions are documented.


-- Jacob

_______________________________________________
Gcrypt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gcrypt-devel