Re: GnuPG 2.4.4 still using legacy packets?
"Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> This backhanded snark is unbecoming of you, Bruce. The authors of > RFC9580 are named individuals - three of whom currently work on PGP > software, and one of those (Niibe) works on GnuPG. Your insinuation that > RFC9580 was written by shadowy, disinterested figures is an insult to > its authors, and you should consider issuing an apology. Thank you, Andrew, for being the first to say this, and to do it in a gentlemanly way. I completely agree with Andrew. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 236 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQR9jsS4W2/t1sENPHkeepTU6H+R1QUCaRNaZgUDAAAAAAAKCRAeepTU6H+R1WRr AP9vxMfgoyKxM1PSUWL5RwFHutZwFgNwnLeIuA34dyTdggD+KazJSSGF4ryIlcA169aM1AVtpvfb aeTxTYoY+BPqdg4= =EQLX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----