Re: GnuPG 2.4.4 still using legacy packets?
"Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> And as a matter of fact, readers can't get rid of it, because GnuPG > still outputs it. So under that interpretation, Werner just has to say > "nope, not gonna change", and just like that the redundant, discouraged, > old format is declared "not obsolete". This exact thing is happening with the obsolescent IPv4 format. IPv6 is out there, has been stable for 20+ years, but major companies are still being slow to adopt it for cost reasons: and because they refuse to modernize, IPv4 remains obsolescent and not obsolete. This thing you think would be silly to happen is, in fact, happening constantly in the tech space. Right now, at this very moment. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 236 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQR9jsS4W2/t1sENPHkeepTU6H+R1QUCaRTbOQUDAAAAAAAKCRAeepTU6H+R1Tq9 AP98KE9FqbnuesrGKoqpGtmScnjrt+t0T+2lCiYBtOa3swD/XBCJTJGc60mNOt86khvjgu60AY7H WgMJRIzk8HHiDgE= =ZhpO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----