Re: GnuPG 2.4.4 still using legacy packets?
Loup Vaillant <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> Let's be honest, interoperability has not ben an issues for likely >> more than a decade. [...] > > Ah, but that is conditional on interoperability not being an issue. As I said, it's not. Hasn't been for many years. Remember, the ability to read the new framing became at least a SHOULD 27 years ago. 18 years ago, the new packet types made it a MUST. Can anyone name *one* OpenPGP implementation in notable use today that still cannot understand the new framing? There isn't, right? > [...] the ancient PGP > implementations that only understand the legacy format, But are these ancient implementations still being used today? Where? By who? Seriously, at this point it's not on me to prove no one such implementation still exist. It's on you to show that it's still being used. So far no one did. Not a single example. If there was one, then one of you would have answered my first query with "this reader still doesn't understand the new framing, we have to still use the old to be compatible with it". Loup _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users