Re: gpg 1.4
"Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Is using gpg 1.4 on an "air-gaped" computer to generate RSA 4096 keys > and encrypting files/messages to owners of such keys still considered > safe? No idea. We're not you. We don't know your threat model, what actors you're facing, what environment you're in. GnuPG just provides tools. Knowing what to do with it, how, and why, is on you. Please don't mistake this for a sarcastic answer. It's an honest one. There is no way Werner, or anyone, can answer your question without first asking a lot of questions. That kind of individualized consultation usually costs money. I will say this: I'm unaware of any reason it would be considered unsafe. Whether it would be considered safe is an open question. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 236 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQR9jsS4W2/t1sENPHkeepTU6H+R1QUCaWYnMQUDAAAAAAAKCRAeepTU6H+R1X7H AP9qtgWg1Bym4FSRLbGJJFQLt1+MuHzVorrDZkYZMQYOngEA8D+nZCvvKaIVK5afEnKAls4EaITH H4Ebjto7lzLjJAA= =lgxo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----