Re: gpg 1.4
Marco Moock via Gnupg-users <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 14.01.2026 11:05 "List O'Rama via Gnupg-users" <[email protected]> wrote: > *Our position is that the general-purpose operating system is > fundamentally inadequate for trusted operations. One can have > a general-purpose system or a trusted system, but one cannot > get both in a single package.* Please let us know why gpg2 is a problem on an air-gaped system and why gpg1 isn't. Trust comes by verifying what code runs on the machines, not by setting it up and not updating it. -- kind regards Marco Send spam to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 870 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJPBAEBCAA5FiEEpXefSZn9R6zNZtTQE76RLz2tRfAFAmlogSobFIAAAAAABAAO bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTEsMiwyAAoJEBO+kS89rUXwyBYQALRAW9VgypeOPQv+tmZU w9oGwkCAvsFJhtz7CtFDzRKfGXcxI0JbQ6Oqmr684zhjCGeFtBMG0omMDJ9z2Otg dZ4JW3EXeArsPC4rBoXid50IUrQoxst6FCIUfKhYqUy4Zwqe/7qaRvdPZtoWs3ZM KRNFlYY7/5KQBKc+YXiz2TD2cpGPgE1EYc5ULfI00NrRqBzNcMrYI+yTiQbJs2J1 yfWhEEDAn2iLsS91YpfvLWwd5fJj5HKdKT7/VNZ7sF5tKRIaiSPtKoroDUIHSwKf kCcTxsnq8VBEQtgo4+uYK56QglfzX6tYr1FeYQQDeEnFPtWZQqTRti06qaiWnmb1 dWNuMQZkl0SRs9Vdy0+gGkQlKVjm8JoVMCjK+sV8FMlni0x3t6J1LMh6I34cNxQg jr9OM3/wPcG7bVUNco8UjSs4up8YnOUzh7tAMT+A3/xgBxeeKeoloj6ijaZ3dmGR a7F8fvrxNPHebZT9tqEl2HOVR9tphLoneNlMYI/T6UEbWvy7tHGu+ns8sQYCcf6y 5m0wjDON5+PDKw6i8eVj/mXQTteV/zrtjsNyWk7d18xOlpWSJcqbx0G/kZD0EvYG Y3qBHgH1VrvEP3vFdYAKTCvGkOuW8EO4lM82VkDi874zSk7ErJaMw+od6+hfMubs DJKZxGkq1JBmwxbejIva7cqt =9TGR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----