Re: [Cannot install 2.5.7 in noble]
Uwe Brauer via Gnupg-users <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Feb 2026 18:02:09 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>> "MMvG" == Meik Michalke via Gnupg-users <[email protected]> writes: > hi, > Am Mittwoch, 18. Februar 2026, 15:02:36 CET schrieb Uwe Brauer via Gnupg- > users: >> I followed the instructions https://repos.gnupg.org/deb/gnupg/noble/ >> >> But the last step >> >> sudo apt-get install gnupg2 >> >> Returns: > that is actually not quite what's suggested by the instructions: > Now you should be able to install/upgrade our packages: > sudo apt update > sudo apt upgrade > sudo apt install gnupg2 I did these steps but with apt-get > we're following the recommendation for using apt instead of apt-get for > interactive use (since the use of apt-get outside of scripts was discouraged > years ago). AFAIK apt does a better job when it comes to dependency handling, > in that it is better equipped to determine the optimal order of package > replacements. Ah I did not realize this, thanks for pointing out, next time, I will try to be more careful. > Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2026, 08:29:07 CET schrieb Uwe Brauer via Gnupg- > users: >> It seems that the following worked: >> >> >> sudo apt-get install libgcrypt20 >> sudo apt-get install libgpg-error0 >> sudo apt-get install gpgconf >> sudo apt-get install gpgsm > this looks to me like you had to find out a working order for yourself with > apt-get in this case. > depending on your specific package selection, even apt may fail in finding a > solution when multiple packages with interdependencies are to be replaced in > one go. but it should at least return an insightful error message on why it is > not able to satisfy the dependency tree. > there's also a blog article with some information on how to use 'apt policy' > to look at the current package preferences when multiple versions are > available: > https://gnupg.org/blog/20250827-new-repository.html Thanks!