Re: Question about cryptographically keyed GDSS — is this known?
"Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users" <[email protected]> Mon, 2 Mar 2026 13:42:09 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I'm not sure if this method is already known, already tried, or if there > is an obvious reason why it wouldn't work that I'm overlooking. > > Does anyone know anything about this ? I strongly encourage people to work on what interests them, so if this interests you, go for it! Seriously! Have fun with it! Here's why it doesn't interest me: it's another attempt to turn a steganographic system into a cryptographic system. History has shown this to be generally unwise. Instead of doing everything in one pass it's generally safer to encrypt what needs encrypting, then send that over a steganographic channel. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 236 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQR9jsS4W2/t1sENPHkeepTU6H+R1QUCaaXaAQUDAAAAAAAKCRAeepTU6H+R1ahJ AQC146DKdKLDybNTwnx4WkoeFo9odSeOjilWQxM928JhCgEA+VRUCTFHuCdvRXx1h5Jwtif+3QQz c4KvLpOkalAQQgc= =nBqO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----