Re: Collision attack against long Key Ids

"Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users" <[email protected]> Sat, 14 Mar 2026 11:47:50 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> I have the feeling that attacks against PGP/GNUPG are being launched 
> based on alleged weaknesses that are later proven not to exist. I see 
> people recommending against using it based on these assumptions.

I've been involved in the PGP community since 1991. You are absolutely 
correct in what you're describing, but it's been this way for at least 
thirty-five years. It will likely always be this way.

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 236 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

wnsEABYIACMWIQR9jsS4W2/t1sENPHkeepTU6H+R1QUCabWDJgUDAAAAAAAKCRAeepTU6H+R1Ufn
AP4jyxlxXmdEcqHl2jOSzP6rhy2VTaQL+qsrLDBN+808ZgEAkWrw/UWdXiigTX1gX5KURORrYPlg
93Tjej7/M2gNrgw=
=2VqF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----