Re: Suggestions of standards added to openpgp/Gnupg/LibrePgp

"Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users" <[email protected]> Tue, 31 Mar 2026 10:24:05 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Hakun, this list overwhelmingly prefers plain text, not HTML. Some list 
members (including Werner!) simply don't read HTML-composed emails. And 
sometimes, HTML emails render in a format that makes it impossible to read.

> As the Baochip-x1 has the hardware to do a lot of cryptographic 
> functions like active zeroisation, Ed25519 signed boot, Glitch sensors, 
> security mesh, PV sensor, ECC-protected RAM,Algorithm-agnostic engine 
> etc I think that these could be added to standards.

Why?

That's the basic question here. What is the use case for LibrePGP that 
isn't being adequately addressed by the spec, and how would these 
changes mitigate that shortcoming?

If you can give a good and terse answer to that question I'll be happy 
to consider this proposal.

> The baochips specs can be found here: https://www.baochip.com/

Do you have any business relationship to this vendor?

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 236 B)