Re: Suggestions of standards added to openpgp/Gnupg/LibrePgp

"Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users" <[email protected]> Tue, 31 Mar 2026 17:08:04 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Hakun, for the second time, please stop sending HTML to this list. The 
people you want to see your email, don't read HTML email.

On 3/31/26 4:18 PM, Hakun_the_eril via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Problems and pitfalls can be solved.

I'm going to be blunt here: okay, then *you* do it.

You're trying to persuade people to implement significant changes to the 
specification, to the architecture, and to the implementation, based on 
nothing more than your saying this is a good idea. If the people you are 
trying to convince to work for you *for free* say, "There are many 
implementation pitfalls inherent in [this]," and your response is to say 
"[p]roblems and pitfalls can be avoided," that tends to make us think 
you don't understand what you're asking for, or don't value our labor. 
Maybe both.

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 236 B)