Re: Post-quantum defaults
"Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users" <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Apr 2026 17:31:05 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Considering the fact that those algorithms are not as well studied as > the classical asymetric algorithms and already some flaws have been > found I would prefer not to do that, but use 2 algorithms, 1 quantum > resistant and 1 classical, combined. This has been discussed at length before. It is not something LibrePGP will be adopting on its own. LibrePGP does not innovate with new cryptosystems. It only uses vetted, peer-reviewed methods. If NIST or other similar groups worldwide decide to adopt layered PQC then LibrePGP might adopt these (as yet non-existent) new standards. If this is something you want, might I suggest talking to NIST? _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 236 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQR9jsS4W2/t1sENPHkeepTU6H+R1QUCae6EGQUDAAAAAAAKCRAeepTU6H+R1a2H AP9afxChGPyae6ZCcTy7IDd6GoGOl9yPDBLBrHOuleywOwEA/k2lfmklC4O/1ISKkXDJXEyRb7XM MqiDzboHv+dMiwc= =nSBy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----