Re: PGP and GnuPG specifications

On 7 May 2026, at 15:19, Werner Koch <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Thu,  7 May 2026 14:13, Andrew Gallagher said:
> 
>> That’s fair when you are taking a once-proprietary protocol and
> 
> Actually, it was never proprietary.  PRZ feared that by a future
> acquisation the new owner could close the source code and thus limit
> good privicay for evertone.  This is why he wanted to have an open
> specification

I used “proprietary” in the sense of “controlled by a single person/org”, so we are in agreement here.

Proprietary as in .docx, not as in Coke; if you will.

A
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users