Re: import key failure, apparent bug

Sam James via Gnupg-users <[email protected]> Sat, 30 May 2026 08:55:25 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user
Organization Gentoo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--===============4050969435964027806==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

marqueandreprisal--- via Gnupg-users <[email protected]> writes:

> Yeah like I said GnuPG you really shouldn't rely on other guys
> libs. GnuPG is not a good fit for me because they do so it is nothing
> but a buggy frontend with unreliable cryptography. Do you inspectors
> have any recommendations?

GnuPG only uses libraries from the GnuPG suite (libgcrypt and
friends). The discussion in this thread is about third party libraries
producing broken PGP keys.

OP hasn't answered which library was used to generate these keys.

sam

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEBBAEWCgCpFiEEJaa7iN2bdkxrVUHCc4QJ9SDfkZAFAmoal+0bFIAAAAAABAAO
bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwyXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25z
Lm9wZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQyNUE2QkI4OEREOUI3NjRDNkI1NTQx
QzI3Mzg0MDlGNTIwREY5MTkwDxxzYW1AZ2VudG9vLm9yZwAKCRBzhAn1IN+RkIGQ
AP9JUZMxmTzjBYslkHbDnYAi2VTU2QyWUuXl3ZnCqm2MxwD/Ran5T8XklUUDXX4D
BBNi1tbcRVxtJmWUJeREXQRjBwU=
=04qN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--


--===============4050969435964027806==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

--===============4050969435964027806==--