Re: Unable to issue subkey revocation
Meik Michalke via Gnupg-users <[email protected]> Mon, 01 Jun 2026 11:30:00 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <10794454.F3ui3E0B66@kasidy> |
--===============2595804158736245474== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart21198841.FMV2BEsqCQ"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --nextPart21198841.FMV2BEsqCQ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; protected-headers="v1" From: Meik Michalke <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Unable to issue subkey revocation Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2026 11:30:00 +0200 Message-ID: <10794454.F3ui3E0B66@kasidy> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Am Montag, 1. Juni 2026, 08:46:46 CEST schrieb Chris DeYoung: > It doesn't need to. The subkey is automatically invalid because the > primary key associated with it is invalid (revoked). yes, first revoking a primary key and then asking to use it once more to revoke one of its subkeys sound a bit like burning down the house and then wanting to lock your flat door. --nextPart21198841.FMV2BEsqCQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iJEEABYKADkWIQRs7BjQbc011HqitSUz/RvPXledgwUCah1RGBsUgAAAAAAEAA5t YW51MiwyLjUrMS4xMiwyLDIACgkQM/0bz15XnYOeEAEA7qUkSBGKvOGZduUh3SXJ VvaQMYkZq/JMO+EBc27PNYgA/jZqosfynZCk/DD32QpUqHWYsVKLxzRe6KPzogwt qYkM =b+w2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart21198841.FMV2BEsqCQ-- --===============2595804158736245474== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users --===============2595804158736245474==--