Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #8761] ksu doesn't allow acquisition of non-forwardable tickets

> On 13 Nov 2018, at 16:57, Greg Hudson via RT <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> A ksu -F option seems reasonable, since it already has a -f option.  
> Adding a -P option at the same time for symmetry seems appropriate, 
> although I don't think proxiable tickets are used with any frequency.
> 
> Ticket 7871 would also address this problem on the KDC side.  (But the 
> client changes are still valuable due to existing KDCs and other KDC 
> implementations.)

Thanks Greg.

A KDC side option would be preferred by us, as it's a lot easier to patch
the KDCs than all the clients, but as you say, fixing ksu in this way
would also be desirable.

Cheers
Toby


-- 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.