Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #8945] krb5kdc: the 32 realms limit
"ÐилÑн ÐалаÑз ов via RT" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.kerberos.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
<URL: https://krbdev.mit.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=8945 > Hello, In my use case, all things shall go in a single Kerberos DataBase (KDB), all under LDAP(kldap). Say it this way: I want to have many users, and each user gets a separate domain. REALM=DOMAIN. So there are many realms with very few users in each. Greetings Dilyan On Tue, 2020-09-08 at 13:20 -0400, Greg Hudson via RT wrote: > For your use case, would it be better to have a separate KDB for each > realm > (implying separate storage, propagation, and backup), or have one KDB > to which > realms could be added and removed? > > To answer one of your questions, if you ran two separate krb5kdc > processes each > with 31 -r options to get around the current 32-realm limitation, > they would > have to serve different ports. > >