Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #8945] krb5kdc: the 32 realms limit

"Дилян Палауз ов via RT" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.kerberos.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
<URL: https://krbdev.mit.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=8945 >

Hello,

In my use case, all things shall go in a single Kerberos DataBase
(KDB), all under LDAP(kldap).  Say it this way: I want to have many
users, and each user gets a separate domain.  REALM=DOMAIN.  So there
are many realms with very few users in each.

Greetings
  Dilyan

On Tue, 2020-09-08 at 13:20 -0400, Greg Hudson via RT wrote:
> For your use case, would it be better to have a separate KDB for each
> realm
> (implying separate storage, propagation, and backup), or have one KDB
> to which
> realms could be added and removed?
> 
> To answer one of your questions, if you ran two separate krb5kdc
> processes each
> with 31 -r options to get around the current 32-realm limitation,
> they would
> have to serve different ports.
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.