Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #8945] krb5kdc: the 32 realms limit
"ÐилÑн ÐалаÑз ов via RT" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.kerberos.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
<URL: https://krbdev.mit.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=8945 > Hello, I withdraw the request. As it turned out, in order to be able change the password for a separate realm, a separate kadmind process has to run. So for many realms hosted on few hosts, many kadmind processes have to run on the hosts for the rare event of changing a password. This is overkill. Greetings Дилян В 21:56 +0300 на 08.09.2020 (вт), Дилян Палаузов написа: > Hello, > > In my use case, all things shall go in a single Kerberos DataBase > (KDB), all under LDAP(kldap). Say it this way: I want to have many > users, and each user gets a separate domain. REALM=DOMAIN. So there > are many realms with very few users in each. > > Greetings > Dilyan > > On Tue, 2020-09-08 at 13:20 -0400, Greg Hudson via RT wrote: > > For your use case, would it be better to have a separate KDB for > > each > > realm > > (implying separate storage, propagation, and backup), or have one > > KDB > > to which > > realms could be added and removed? > > > > To answer one of your questions, if you ran two separate krb5kdc > > processes each > > with 31 -r options to get around the current 32-realm limitation, > > they would > > have to serve different ports. > > > > _______________________________________________ krb5-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krb5-bugs