Re: rcache question

Simo Sorce <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.kerberos.devel
Organization Red Hat, Inc.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 2020-08-13 at 15:29 +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-08-13 at 11:17 -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
> > On 8/13/20 8:45 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > Looking at the mit-krb5 code is seems to me that rcache type "none" always
> > > returns true so I could just make :
> > >  have_rcache_type(const char *type) { return 1; }
> > > Is that a correct assumption ?
> > 
> > Yes, since it is no longer necessary to detect really old versions.
> 
> OK, thanks!
> 
> > I would recommend switching to mod_auth_gssapi if possible.
> 
> It is planned but for now I just need to make the server run with 1.18
> Would browser notice if I switch to  mod_auth_gssapi ? Some config to tweak ?

If you use just basic settings there should be no difference.
If you used some obscure mod_auth_krb config options you may need to
understand what they did and apply appropriate options to
mod_auth_gssapi configuration to compensate.

So far I do not know of any major difference, and haven't had bug
reports of situations where mod_auth_gssapi conf could not be adapted
to work as wanted.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
RHEL Crypto Team
Red Hat, Inc




_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list             [email protected]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.