Re: k5_mutex_lock: Received error 22 (Invalid argument)
Robbie Harwood <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.kerberos.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> writes: > Hello, > > I do not believe this is a known issue. The place that generates that > diagnostic assert()s on failure, so hopefully you have one or more > core dumps available. The backtrace from the dump (ideally with line > numbers in libkrb5support, but even without) would be a great place to > start. Right. In particular, if the coredump suggests that the internal mutex state is invalid, this points at memory corruption, and I would suggest attempting to reproduce with valgrind. (When I added the print statement, it was so that the compiler would stop optimizing out this information. At the time the underlying corruption issue happened to be in 389ds, though this has of course been fixed since.) Thanks, --Robbie _______________________________________________ krbdev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 832 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEA5qc6hnelQjDaHWqJTL5F2qVpEIFAl+gQIQACgkQJTL5F2qV pEJU9xAAgTiDa5DmnRQlkCzbvob5myFMTCN3vT7OmIS9XrN4+jTLNGm5EfO4lVek sVusV8bf6MkBpVaMzuqkKTurEcEWnDTvSxLEh0LKTkts/qmv2il0D+SOVAmIOEg2 88AjURKyc+CZPKMruBc/ZAOuAqjgwh+TLHdWcLwCQdU1r1K1Gi98iL4n94k8XOVK qVSJnvDHikINjKO5+Jg8ydvOp2X3hKHo55nq/xXvQQjavbdJWCBWLXvB704F2OLO HVD0HTZIJ+MAc3AlL5mqIraUyxPp7RDLkUCVwpQkOkY9U7pGsuxIyUzbvMwLoMf5 YxFDMplePvHRpC9D8y8eJq62xGKsk94eaQDPSDPeatD10U2K89BlAsvtRuPSBHYD x5e/UDhAeF6QUEDG9kqL/k1U+PiapDGAdY3EhVtywOK6fe+X23MRDXcvGSjJMXlm Bhmf5cA5cM1HR2ING1t+Orbd6Sfmev6j65VYO2Phz/ZNIipoSRZXwqprkmWr2AY/ 3w1YxRqyhZb6RCLtYjpl99FI7Ojh8RdvVEyECopqwdpVzOePW5PcgKwHZC9smite /trXD1zC1XCNPgsECIKBjGTX0+IFNzcMpTibqmUeV1aa8qGfJQpw8xlz0XH+9TVt w37Wfa1jSbri8ZAAHNUiZ5cKeRR9SDssJNdPwXo5RL1Ly9VhH0I= =GCw3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----