Re: Not building kcpytkt/kdeltkt

On Mon, 2021-08-02 at 18:41 -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
> On 8/2/21 6:35 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> > I guess I'm wondering ... how come?  I admit those utilities might
> > not be
> > useful that often, but it seems like they could be.  Was it just an
> > oversight?  Any objection to a patch to add those back to the
> > build?
> 
> That was before my time, so I don't know if it was deliberate or an
> oversight.  (I've looked over list archives in the past and never
> found
> anything conclusive.)  But I'd rather not add them at this point if
> there isn't a real need for them.  Some of the use cases for them can
> be
> met by kinit -S or kvno --out-ccache.

MIT krb5 isn't my project, so take this as just an outsider's random
opinion: 

One small thing to consider is that each new binary will need to be
packaged (or not packaged, most packaging systems watch out for
unexpected new files), and if packages Debian will require a manpage.

I guess I'm just saying that while not high-cost, it also isn't free.

Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Andrew Bartlett (he/him)       https://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Team Member (since 2001) https://samba.org
Samba Team Lead, Catalyst IT   https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba

Samba Development and Support, Catalyst IT - Expert Open Source
Solutions

_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list             [email protected]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev