Re: Not building kcpytkt/kdeltkt

Robbie Harwood <[email protected]> Tue, 03 Aug 2021 11:37:41 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.encryption.kerberos.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> writes:

>>>>We expanded the backends that implement krb5_cc_remove_cred() due to
>>>>samba's usage:
>>>
>>> I mean, fair enough ... but how did you test those backends?
>>
>>krb5's test suite covers them:
>>https://github.com/krb5/krb5/blob/master/src/lib/krb5/ccache/t_cc.c
>
> I _did_ see that, but it only covers MEMORY, FILE, and KEYRING.  It
> doesn't cover, for example, KCM, DIR, or MSLSA (although I am not sure
> the test suite works on Windows).

The KDC isn't built for Windows, so the test suite in full won't work
there.  Whether any parts would is a question I am the wrong person to
answer :)

DIR is implemented in terms of FILE - a pass-through.

KCM just sends commands to the daemon, and there's a REMOVE_CRED
command.  So it'd be more a test of the daemon than the ccache layer.

Be well,
--Robbie

_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list             [email protected]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 861 B)