Re: Suggestion of change to certauth plugin interface
Ken Hornstein via krbdev <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Feb 2023 16:09:26 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.kerberos.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> Sure. I talked before that one of my plugins was for doing OCSP >> checking of client certificates for PKINIT. Well, it turns out that >> to do that, you need to build up the complete certificate chain so you >> can check the status of intermediate certificates. To do that, you >> [...] > >Wait, why doesn't the KDC furnish the whole chain to the certauth >plugin? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I imagine it probably should, but I have to live with the API as it exists now. I suspect this wasn't thought about when the plugin API was created, and that's fine; it's hard to imagine all of the things you might want to do with a plugin when it is first created. Also, depending on what kind of OCSP server you are talking to you probably need the original list of CAs to verify the OCSP responder certificate. I think my other points about the realm list being provided to the certauth plugin initializer still stand. --Ken _______________________________________________ krbdev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev