Re: Supporting custom requests for MS-NRPC

On 9/29/25 03:09, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> Since it needs access to the encrypted keys, that separate daemon would
> effectively be a KDC in the sense that it will need to verify signatures
> and issue a PAC content. It is a large duplicate of the feature set
> provided by the KDC code.

I don't understand how that squares with the proposed option 2:

   Option 2. Implement a custom pre-authentication plugin that hooks into
   KDC's loop (via vt->loop()'s verto_ctx passed there) and handles custom
   requests over the custom (e.g. UNIX domain socket) interface. All it
   needs is access to the KDC's krb5 context to be able to call for KDB
   methods and perform PAC validation.

In this design option, how would the custom code leverage the KDC code 
for signature verification and PAC issuance?

> I would consider having a separate daemon in such case a security issue
> as well.

Is it a security issue that kadmind is a separate daemon from krb5kdc?

_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list             [email protected]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev