RE: Load Balancing KCDs

Jonathan Towles <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.kerberos.general
Message-ID <MN2PR15MB30710F9484F161CC530AD15DB9859@MN2PR15MB3071.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
Yeah I saw this also.

>From what I've read holistically, Putting your DCs behind a VIP tends to be problematic because the member server name doesn't match the name of the SPN thus it becomes vehemently unhappy.

I suppose you could possibly build an ASA similar to how you do Kerberos with Exchange and try to leverage that but I've read/heard there's a ton of reliability issues and you should just rely on the krb5.conf like:

[realms]
         ATHENA.MIT.EDU = {
             kdc = kerberos.mit.edu
             kdc = kerberos-1.mit.edu
             kdc = kerberos-2.mit.edu:750
             admin_server = kerberos.mit.edu
             master_kdc = kerberos.mit.edu
             default_domain = mit.edu

Jon Towles
CTO, Synterex
(m) 978-609-5545

  

-----Original Message-----
From: Robbie Harwood <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 4:48 PM
To: Jonathan Towles <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Load Balancing KCDs

Jonathan Towles <[email protected]> writes:

> Does anyone have experience putting DCs behind a network load balancer 
> for Kerberos Authentication?
>
> Depending on who you ask, it doesn't really work. I wanted to ask the 
> group to see if anyone has strong experience in doing it and if it's 
> feasible?

I usually refer to Simo's post on this:
https://ssimo.org/blog/id_019.html

Thanks,
--Robbie

________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list           [email protected]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.