Re: 2FA with krb5

Ken Hornstein <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.kerberos.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> I am not sure of the client coverage of the OTP FAST factor, though.
>
>For what it's worth, although my pam-krb5 module implements FAST including
>both keyed and anonymous FAST, it does not implement FAST OTP.  This is
>because (a) I didn't find any documentation of what I was supposed to do
>as a client (it's been years since I looked so this quite possibly has
>changed),

Huh, I _kinda_ thought that if you had FAST going, you got FAST OTP (on
the client at least) for free!  Which shows what I know.  Maybe it works
already and you never tested it?

>and (b) attempting to set up a reasonable test environment
>looked painful.  In particular, there was (at the time, again haven't
>checked recently) a lot of hand-waving about exactly to set up the RADIUS
>part, since MIT Kerberos just treats it as an oracle.

Right, THIS is actually a huge problem.  Like having to set up a RADIUS
server?  Ugh.  It's also a problem for development!  Like the only
way I have found to effectively test preauth mechanisms is to do
testing on one of our replica KDCs.

--Ken
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list           [email protected]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.