Re: Suppressing conf/integ flags in krb5 GSS tokens

On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 09:51 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 23:03 -0500, Nico Williams wrote:
> > On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:59:24PM -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
> > > Comments?
> > 
> > Heimdal's SPNEGO implementation neither checks the the GSS_C_INTEG_FLAG
> > ret_flag, nor requests it as a req_flag.  Heimdal's SPNEGO discovers
> > integrity support by calling gss_get_mic(): if it returns GSS_S_UNAVAIL,
> > then integrity support is not provided, otherwise it is.  Heimdal also
> > assumes that if a MIC is received then integrity support must be
> > available.
> > 
> > I believe calling GSS_GetMIC() and GSS_VerifyMIC() even when
> > GSS_C_INTEG_FLAG is not set in ret_flags is perfectly permissible in
> > RFC2743.
> 
> I think this is fine, and if you receive a MIC you have no other option
> (well, except fail).
> 
> > Disabling the MIC in SPNEGO when GSS_C_INTEG_FLAG is not set in
> > ret_flags, combined with the new cred options, is likely (I think) to
> > fail to interop with Microsoft's SPNEGO when used in the application
> > protocol in question.  It ought to fail to interop, but who know,
> > perhaps MSFT's SPNEGO will not require the MIC in this protocol because
> > it's running over TLS, but I'd not bet on it.  The Heimdal approach
> > seems better.
> 
> Keep in mind we tested this, with the patch we sent Greg.
> It works with all flags turned off and no special handling for MIC,
> today.

I take this back, thinking again, the code where we exercised this uses
its own SPNEGO layer :/

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York

_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list             [email protected]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev