Re: ipropd question
Nico Williams <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:54:40 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.kerberos.heimdal.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20170324205439.GH7480@localhost> |
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:21:13AM -0400, Thomas M. Payerle wrote: > My experience is that ipropd-slave will try to apply the change log > sent from the master, but if it cannot for some reason, it will ignore > the change but bump the database version (and log a warning/error in > its logs). I believe that's true. It should probably trigger a full prop instead. Perhaps it should schedule one for later so as to prevent a tight loop of full props if some bug could trigger repeated failures to apply incrementals. I've opened issue #269 for this on github. > There are pros and cons of that behavior; briefly it makes > the ipropd service more "robust" but also means that if one is not monitoring > the logs the DBs can get out of sync. I think it's just not robust. Nico --