Re: Performance over RDP

Martin Vogt <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Jul 2026 16:41:22 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.opensc.devel
Message-ID <CAOE8yMCS79ym9-QEx8fFtUcrSGdC4W_k2YTxaQV-psaHkaeVww@mail.gmail.com>
--===============1916621920884354685==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005f1fc90655f24595"

--0000000000005f1fc90655f24595
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hello Frank,

> work with the latest version, in particular with
>  https://github.com/OpenSC/OpenSC/pull/3126 included

I did a short test, one run only, (with and without the patch, over the RDP
connection)
Should the patch have such a big impact on normal operation? (see below)

I did a :

$ time pkcs11-tool --list-objects
real 0m20.570s
user 0m0.127s
sys 0m0.102s

with the patch.


And the same without:

real 0m26.568s
user 0m0.119s
sys 0m0.095s

6 secs improvement? This would be a huge benefit !
(I will do more testing (more runs), this was only one run)

Btw, I'm currently try to get a sssd patch merged.

https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/8799

Currently it seems there is a small question regarding opensc parallel
execution.
(I tried to answer it as far as I could)
(Maybe someone with more knowledge can have a short look at it?)

best regards,

Martin

--0000000000005f1fc90655f24595
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">Hello Frank,<div><br></div><div>&gt; work=
 with the latest version, in particular with<br>&gt;=C2=A0 <a href=3D"https=
://github.com/OpenSC/OpenSC/pull/3126">https://github.com/OpenSC/OpenSC/pul=
l/3126</a> included<br></div><div><br></div><div>I did a short=C2=A0test, o=
ne run only, (with and without the patch, over the=C2=A0RDP connection)</di=
v><div>Should the patch have such a big impact on normal operation? (see be=
low)</div><div><br></div><div>I did a :</div><div><br></div><div>$<span sty=
le=3D"background-color:transparent">=C2=A0time pkcs11-tool --list-objects</=
span></div><div>real	0m20.570s<br>user	0m0.127s<br>sys	0m0.102s<br></div><d=
iv><br></div><div>with the patch.=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>=
<div>And the same without:</div><div><br></div><div>real	0m26.568s<br>user	=
0m0.119s<br>sys	0m0.095s<br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quo=
te_container"><div><br></div><div>6 secs improvement? This would be a huge =
benefit !</div><div>(I will do more testing (more runs), this was only one =
run)</div><div><br></div><div>Btw, I&#39;m currently try to get a sssd patc=
h merged.</div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/=
pull/8799">https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/8799</a></div><div><br></div><=
div>Currently=C2=A0it seems there is a small question regarding opensc para=
llel execution.</div><div>(I tried to answer it as far as I could)</div><di=
v>(Maybe someone with more knowledge can have a short look at it?)</div><di=
v><br></div><div>best regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Martin</div></div><=
/div>

--0000000000005f1fc90655f24595--


--===============1916621920884354685==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline


--===============1916621920884354685==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Opensc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensc-devel

--===============1916621920884354685==--