Re: [EXT] Re: Building "Fat" Mac Binary, or Cross-Compiling from ARM arch to x86-64
"'Mounir IDRASSI' via openssl-users" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.openssl.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | IDRIX |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/3/2025 3:01 AM, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL wrote: > In my experience, it’s been _never_ useful to build “fat” binaries. > They brought nothing but problems. > > In our place we build x86_64 binaries for Intel, and AARCH64 for > Silicon - and is been perfectly satisfactory here. I recommend > considering the same (proven) approach. On my side, using "fat" binaries on macOS for OpenSSL linked products has been a positive experience. I have been using this approach for various macOS products since Mac OS X Tiger to provide single installation packages that target all architectures (including ppc, i386). Of course, it depends on the type and complexity of the application logic but usually it is possible to sort out issues without much difficulty, and OpenSSL is almost never the cause of any issues. -- Mounir IDRASSI -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "openssl-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openssl-users+unsubscribe-MCmKBN63+Bmbup2nOX2J7Q@public.gmane.org To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/openssl.org/d/msgid/openssl-users/a9a300d1-fe63-48ae-b38e-ea4bd1aacc1c%40idrix.net.