Re: [EXT] Re: Building "Fat" Mac Binary, or Cross-Compiling from ARM arch to x86-64
Nick <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.openssl.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/3/25 4:13 AM, 'Mounir IDRASSI' via openssl-users wrote: > On my side, using "fat" binaries on macOS for OpenSSL linked products > has been a positive experience. > I have been using this approach for various macOS products since Mac > OS X Tiger to provide single installation packages that target all > architectures (including ppc, i386). > Of course, it depends on the type and complexity of the application > logic but usually it is possible to sort out issues without much > difficulty, and OpenSSL is almost never the cause of any issues. > I appreciate this. We're reading up on pros and cons of Universal binaries for MacOS. I'd appreciate any insight you have, especially any issues you've seen. Regards, Nick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "openssl-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openssl-users+unsubscribe-MCmKBN63+Bmbup2nOX2J7Q@public.gmane.org To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/openssl.org/d/msgid/openssl-users/c93919aa-97f6-d3ff-2b05-5c48323c2eec%40codesniffer.com.