Re: introduce a function like SSL_CTX_set_security_standards()?

Michael Richardson <mcr-SWp7JaYWvAQV+D8aMU/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.openssl.user
Message-ID <1183388.1746528239@dyas>
Matt Caswell <[email protected]> wrote:
    > How is this proposal different to the existing
    > `SSL_CTX_set_security_level()`?

That's an integer which seems to have to increase as new protocols are
introduced.

SSL_CTX_set_security_standards() would seem to be, mixing C/shell:

SSL_CTX_set_security_standards() {
  SSL_CTX_set_security_level(`cat /etc/openssl/security-level.txt`);
 }

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "openssl-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openssl-users+unsubscribe-MCmKBN63+Bmbup2nOX2J7Q@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/openssl.org/d/msgid/openssl-users/1183388.1746528239%40dyas.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 658 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=qgR3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.