Re: introduce a function like SSL_CTX_set_security_standards()?
Michael Richardson <mcr-SWp7JaYWvAQV+D8aMU/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.openssl.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1183388.1746528239@dyas> |
Matt Caswell <[email protected]> wrote: > How is this proposal different to the existing > `SSL_CTX_set_security_level()`? That's an integer which seems to have to increase as new protocols are introduced. SSL_CTX_set_security_standards() would seem to be, mixing C/shell: SSL_CTX_set_security_standards() { SSL_CTX_set_security_level(`cat /etc/openssl/security-level.txt`); } -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "openssl-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openssl-users+unsubscribe-MCmKBN63+Bmbup2nOX2J7Q@public.gmane.org To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/openssl.org/d/msgid/openssl-users/1183388.1746528239%40dyas.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 658 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAEBCgAdFiEEow/1qDVgAbWL2zxYcAKuwszYgEMFAmgZ5+4ACgkQcAKuwszY gEMfogv/Ts3uEicFsSesjEDKeyj7DOqN1JtishAI9lPmOh2mO0BZ7qzZ3Mw62rIt ZMFbGVrGdIHGcARq7WkyXdO9gC33Xz2OE1xm1GR+VumhhlmmZ+lOVQOUl5zA0uKd YYZ8UZxG3J2e+QYLqxzwHmmoiJKjHFCAZM2Jl1Ajyok3MBt60WFEtgZ33ZJzBtde jN1aLfeINs1Rd3NcZLzCAEz6o7qxp9hrRBGW5yuMvrNoVvzzZaw0vAKAL4lrhV5N lU60m7siYDfPxjEPAmWINwx8QMPcvpOqzNcQY5p2ioevRhIlyTsgNRPcn30seRW2 1XeZn463IzCfFqOJjBlP/SvsoIJ1TQ5MGbaXPsZjFerUwuwa71MSVWElrq0TAzVj L/M/BckT41T++oYfPYwziR1VN2KwIHAfFOL5vwF78x9pFXn3gqcYHGcUBKmsvjkR XNYU8UW3oklMyBjXMPYX8OTz/dWjoMccZxgYmNqeNLgJkAM44VOu6XOIRmd6yzBo Wq6Fh1ag =qgR3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----