RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: OpenSSL and PQC/FIPS support

"'Martin Bonner' via openssl-users" <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Apr 2026 06:23:40 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.openssl.user
Message-ID <PH3PPF7A88A980AD6C9D8A344703C2626A2F3232@PH3PPF7A88A980A.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
--_000_PH3PPF7A88A980AD6C9D8A344703C2626A2F3232PH3PPF7A88A980A_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> then all the PQC algorithms which are part of this OpenSSL will be FIPS 1=
40-3 compliant

Not quite (or at least, not necessarily).  The correct statement is =E2=80=
=9Call the algorithms (including PQ algorithms) supported by the FIPS provi=
der in this OpenSSL will be FIPS 140-3 compliant=E2=80=9D.

I haven=E2=80=99t checked, but it is perfectly possible that there are unap=
proved PQ algorithms which are supported by the base provider.  In the clas=
sical world, the base provider supports CAMELLIA (or at least, it used to),=
 the FIPS provider has never supported CAMELLIA because it isn=E2=80=99t an=
 approved algorithm.

Martin Bonner


From: Raghu Chidambaram <[email protected]>
Sent: 16 April 2026 07:12
To: openssl-users <[email protected]>
Cc: Raghu Chidambaram <[email protected]>; Martin Bonner <Martin.Bon=
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: OpenSSL and PQC/FIPS support

HI Team, GM, In https:=E2=80=8A//csrc.=E2=80=8Anist.=E2=80=8Agov/projects/c=
ryptographic-module-validation-program/modules-in-process/modules-in-proces=
s-list OpenSSL FIPS Provider The OpenSSL Corporation OpenSSL Corporation co=
rporation@=E2=80=8Aopenssl.=E2=80=8Aorg Voice: 877-673-6775 FIPS

HI Team,

GM,

In https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cryptographic-module-validation-program/m=
odules-in-process/modules-in-process-list<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https=
:/csrc.nist.gov/projects/cryptographic-module-validation-program/modules-in=
-process/modules-in-process-list__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!cn7ZZT_-25LDzb5jpUAc5H92a=
_1XhJ9WnBHNw1kBQDMtUMzLCNRxm_pv4KY3dlrtuGtkYbjejIR6Wae8qs7qagtrcis$>


OpenSSL FIPS Provider
The OpenSSL Corporation

  *   OpenSSL Corporation
  *   [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
  *   Voice: 877-673-6775

FIPS 140-3
Pending Review (11/25/2025)

For the above OpenSSL FIPS validation is in progress, that means here with =
OpenSSL 3.5.4 which contains the PQC related algorithms.
so once this get the approval then all the PQC algorithms which are part of=
 this OpenSSL will be FIPS 140-3 compliant and as i mentioned earlier then =
we can
take this OpenSSL 3.5.4 FIPS provider and bundle in our application to clai=
m both PQC and FIPS compliant ?

please correct me if our understanding is wrong

Thanks,
Raghu
On Wednesday, 15 April 2026 at 22:12:06 UTC+5:30 Raghu Chidambaram wrote:
Thanks Martin Bonner and Neil,
Thanks for the information.

 then until 3.5.4 is approved, FIPS and PQC are mutually exclusive with Ope=
nSSL (and FIPS is impossible between Sep 2026 and the approval of 3.5.4).
- [Raghu] so both are mutually exclusive if i understood correctly.

These are supported currently only by the 3.5.4 FIPS provider and later ver=
sions.  Currently 3.5.4 is undergoing review with our lab and NIST:
-[Raghu] I have little confusion here, when we are talkin about the OpenSSL=
 version 3.5.4 is undergoing review means the FIPS provider ( fips modules)=
 inside that 3.5.4 version which also contains the SSL and Crypto libraries=
 am i correct. Just like OpenSSL 3.0.9 got FIPS 140-2 , OpenSSL 3.1.2 versi=
on got FIPS 140-3 , similarly OpenSSL 3.5.4 is going for CMVP validation an=
d it will be 140-3 compliant or some other FIPS compliant?

PQC algorithms approved by FIPS include FIPS 203 (ML-KEM), FIPS 204 (ML-DSA=
) and FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA)
-[Raghu] only above 3 algorithms are FIPS approved as of today? is that cor=
rect statement.

FIPS and PQC are definitely _not_ mutually exclusive, you can definitely us=
e both PQC algorithms and be FIPS-140-3 compliant.
- [Raghu] we have release our application to all the products/customer in D=
ell saying that we are FIPS compliant, i m part of Dell Organization previo=
usly we were using OpenSSL 1.0.2 FIPS version which was supported by OpenSS=
L team for few years later we moved to OpenSSL 3.0.x and now we are at Open=
SSL 3.5.5 version in our application.
so we cant use few algorithms which are PQC and few which are FIPS 140-3 an=
d claim for both? is that correct? we want to claim FIPS 140-3 as of now wh=
ich is in progress and if we move to PQC safe algorithms ( somehow not sure=
 as of now) then we cant claim for FIPS 140-3 right?

Thanks,
Raghu

On Wednesday, 15 April 2026 at 19:42:45 UTC+5:30 Martin Bonner wrote:
My reading of the original email is that Raghu=E2=80=99s organization achie=
ved FIPS compliance by using the FIPS-approved OpenSSL provider.  This is g=
ood, because I would have said that it while it is touch-and-go whether Ope=
nSSL 3.5.4 is going to be FIPS-approved before Sep 2026, it is very unlikel=
y that a submission made today by Raghu=E2=80=99s organization would be app=
roved by then.

There is also a question of whether Raghu=E2=80=99s organization needs =E2=
=80=9CFIPS approved=E2=80=9D, or whether =E2=80=9CFIPS pending=E2=80=9D is =
good enough.  It is almost inconceivable to me that 3.5.4 won=E2=80=99t be =
eventually approved, it=E2=80=99s just a matter of bureaucracy.  OTOH, if F=
IPS approved is a contractual requirement (e.g. because the US Government i=
s a customer), then until 3.5.4 is approved, FIPS and PQC are mutually excl=
usive with OpenSSL (and FIPS is impossible between Sep 2026 and the approva=
l of 3.5.4).

On =E2=80=9CPQC equivalents for classical algorithms=E2=80=9D, don=E2=80=99=
t forget that if you are using AES128 you need to switch to AES256 (but AES=
256 is already considered acceptable).

Martin Bonner


From: Neil Horman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: 15 April 2026 14:53
To: Raghu Chidambaram <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: openssl-users <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: OpenSSL and PQC/FIPS support

Raghu- PQC algorithms approved by FIPS include FIPS 203 (ML-KEM), FIPS 204 =
(ML-DSA) and FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA). These are supported currently only by the =
3.=E2=80=8A5.=E2=80=8A4 FIPS provider and later versions. Currently 3.=E2=
=80=8A5.=E2=80=8A4 is undergoing review with our lab and
Raghu-
     PQC algorithms approved by FIPS include FIPS 203 (ML-KEM), FIPS 204 (M=
L-DSA) and FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA).  These are supported currently only by the 3=
.5.4 FIPS provider and later versions.  Currently 3.5.4 is undergoing revie=
w with our lab and NIST:
https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cryptographic-module-validation-program/modu=
les-in-process/modules-in-process-list<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/c=
src.nist.gov/projects/cryptographic-module-validation-program/modules-in-pr=
ocess/modules-in-process-list__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!bZut-uZon_VIGux_15WX7wQQlDCz=
2htlQH38Q5r93kD1FyyfFNGBYigp6MnOcctxqdvCUvGlZbPhhLscJuPv$>


FIPS and PQC are definitely _not_ mutually exclusive, you can definitely us=
e both PQC algorithms and be FIPS-140-3 compliant.  The only current barrie=
r is that our provider has not yet been certified by NIST.  That need not b=
e a barrier for you however, if you are planning on doing a full submission=
 of openssl through your own lab (though the time effort on that is constra=
ined by your lab and NIST).

Neil


On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 9:43=E2=80=AFAM Raghu Chidambaram <pcraghu...@gmail=
.com<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Team,

Our organization is planning to go for PQC support so that application is q=
uantum safe.
we are already FIPS 140-2 compliant and we are also in the process of makin=
g it FIPS 140-3 compliant as 140-2 will be sunset by Sep 2026.

FIPS
- Our application is FIPS 140-2 and with FIPS provider 3.0.9. We made this =
possible with the help of lot of to and fro discussions over the OpenSSL Fo=
rum for good amount of time :) :) .

For 140-3 we did analysis and understood that with OpenSSL version say 3.5.=
x we need to bundle the FIPS provider version 3.1.2 ( 140-3 compliant ) ins=
tead of 3.0.9( 140-2) compliant. Hope this is correct.

PQC
- For PQC we just started analysis and checking which all algorithms we nee=
d to use in order to make it PQC compliant. As part of this we want to unde=
rstand which of OpenSSL supports PQC and is there any doc / list which conv=
eys like from algorithm A we need to move to algorithm, means how to migrat=
e from current set to PQC safe set is what we are checking mainly.

- one more point what we understood from the discussions internally and wit=
h the teams who are handling inside our organization that FIPS and PQC cant=
 go hand in hand, like if we are in FIPS 140-3 version we cant claim for PQ=
C as algo's are different and if we are going to be PQC safe then we can't =
claim FIPS 140-3 support, is this correct statement? or our assumption is w=
rong?

Need your help and inputs to proceed on these aspects

Thank you,
Raghu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
openssl-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/openssl.org/d/msg=
id/openssl-users/9d605db8-9220-491c-9424-12b42ed92948n%40openssl.org<https:=
//urldefense.com/v3/__https:/groups.google.com/a/openssl.org/d/msgid/openss=
l-users/9d605db8-9220-491c-9424-12b42ed92948n*40openssl.org?utm_medium=3Dem=
ail&utm_source=3Dfooter__;JQ!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!bZut-uZon_VIGux_15WX7wQQlDCz2htl=
QH38Q5r93kD1FyyfFNGBYigp6MnOcctxqdvCUvGlZbPhhPVv707z$>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
openssl-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/openssl.org/d/msg=
id/openssl-users/CAJbOq16tR2n_U1tWtzbCUzt57PjEZQbiJRjvM-3vPQ3gkrGyXA%40mail=
.gmail.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/groups.google.com/a/openssl.o=
rg/d/msgid/openssl-users/CAJbOq16tR2n_U1tWtzbCUzt57PjEZQbiJRjvM-3vPQ3gkrGyX=
A*40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=3Demail&utm_source=3Dfooter__;JQ!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj=
2!bZut-uZon_VIGux_15WX7wQQlDCz2htlQH38Q5r93kD1FyyfFNGBYigp6MnOcctxqdvCUvGlZ=
bPhhA0Qq6iv$>.
Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for=
 the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this me=
ssage has been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or discl=
ose of the information it contains. Please notify Entrust immediately and d=
elete the message from your system.

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
openssl-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to openssl-users+unsubscribe-MCmKBN63+Bmbup2nOX2J7Q@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/openssl.org/d/msg=
id/openssl-users/PH3PPF7A88A980AD6C9D8A344703C2626A2F3232%40PH3PPF7A88A980A=
.namprd11.prod.outlook.com.

--_000_PH3PPF7A88A980AD6C9D8A344703C2626A2F3232PH3PPF7A88A980A_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr=
osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http:=
//www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8">
<meta name=3D"Generator" content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
	{font-family:Wingdings;
	panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
	{font-family:"Cambria Math";
	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Calibri;
	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Aptos;}
@font-face
	{font-family:"Arial Black";
	panose-1:2 11 10 4 2 1 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:"Source Sans Pro";}
@font-face
	{font-family:"Gotham Book";
	panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0cm;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
	{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
	font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
	color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
	{mso-style-type:export-only;
	mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
	{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
	margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
	{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
	{mso-list-id:465902752;
	mso-list-template-ids:-1443361682;}
@list l0:level1
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:=EF=82=B7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:36.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level2
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:o;
	mso-level-tab-stop:72.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:"Courier New";
	mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
@list l0:level3
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:=EF=82=A7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:108.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l0:level4
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:=EF=82=A7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:144.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l0:level5
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:=EF=82=A7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:180.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l0:level6
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:=EF=82=A7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:216.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l0:level7
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:=EF=82=A7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:252.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l0:level8
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:=EF=82=A7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:288.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l0:level9
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:=EF=82=A7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:324.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Wingdings;}
ol
	{margin-bottom:0cm;}
ul
	{margin-bottom:0cm;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=3D"EN-GB" link=3D"blue" vlink=3D"purple" style=3D"word-wrap:brea=
k-word">
<div class=3D"WordSection1">
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"mso-fareast-language:EN-US">&gt; </sp=
an><span style=3D"font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;,sans-serif;color:=
#1B1B1B">then all the PQC algorithms which are part of this OpenSSL will be=
 FIPS 140-3 compliant<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quo=
t;,sans-serif;color:#1B1B1B"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quo=
t;,sans-serif;color:#1B1B1B">Not quite (or at least, not necessarily).&nbsp=
; The correct statement is =E2=80=9Call the algorithms (including PQ algori=
thms) supported by the FIPS provider in this OpenSSL will be
 FIPS 140-3 compliant=E2=80=9D.&nbsp; <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quo=
t;,sans-serif;color:#1B1B1B"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quo=
t;,sans-serif;color:#1B1B1B">I haven=E2=80=99t checked, but it is perfectly=
 possible that there are unapproved PQ algorithms which are supported by th=
e base provider.&nbsp; In the classical world, the base provider
 supports CAMELLIA (or at least, it used to), the FIPS provider has never s=
upported CAMELLIA because it isn=E2=80=99t an approved algorithm.</span><sp=
an style=3D"mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p>&nbs=
p;</o:p></span></p>
<table class=3D"MsoNormalTable" border=3D"0" cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=
=3D"0" style=3D"border-collapse:collapse">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width=3D"265" valign=3D"top" style=3D"width:198.8pt;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0=
cm 5.4pt">
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"margin-bottom:2.7pt;text-autospace:none"><s=
pan lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:14.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial Black&=
quot;,sans-serif;color:#6F2176">Martin Bonner</span><span lang=3D"EN-US" st=
yle=3D"font-size:14.0pt;font-family:&quot;Gotham Book&quot;,serif;color:#6F=
2176;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></=
span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p>&nbs=
p;</o:p></span></p>
<div style=3D"border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm =
0cm 0cm">
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><b><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;fo=
nt-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,sans-serif">From:</span></b><span lang=3D"EN-=
US" style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,sans-serif"> =
Raghu Chidambaram &lt;[email protected]&gt;
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 16 April 2026 07:12<br>
<b>To:</b> openssl-users &lt;[email protected]&gt;<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Raghu Chidambaram &lt;[email protected]&gt;; Martin Bonne=
r &lt;[email protected]&gt;<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: OpenSSL and PQC/FIPS support<o:p></o:p><=
/span></p>
</div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-line-height-alt:.75pt"><span style=3D"f=
ont-size:1.0pt;color:white">HI Team, GM, In https:</span><span style=3D"fon=
t-size:1.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,sans-serif;color:white">=E2=80=
=8A</span><span style=3D"font-size:1.0pt;color:white">//csrc.</span><span s=
tyle=3D"font-size:1.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,sans-serif;color:whit=
e">=E2=80=8A</span><span style=3D"font-size:1.0pt;color:white">nist.</span>=
<span style=3D"font-size:1.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,sans-serif;col=
or:white">=E2=80=8A</span><span style=3D"font-size:1.0pt;color:white">gov/p=
rojects/cryptographic-module-validation-program/modules-in-process/modules-=
in-process-list
 OpenSSL FIPS Provider The OpenSSL Corporation OpenSSL Corporation corporat=
ion@</span><span style=3D"font-size:1.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,san=
s-serif;color:white">=E2=80=8A</span><span style=3D"font-size:1.0pt;color:w=
hite">openssl.</span><span style=3D"font-size:1.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial=
&quot;,sans-serif;color:white">=E2=80=8A</span><span style=3D"font-size:1.0=
pt;color:white">org
 Voice: 877-673-6775 FIPS<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-line-height-alt:.75pt"><span style=3D"f=
ont-size:1.0pt;color:white"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">HI Team,<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">GM,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">In&nbsp;<a href=3D"https://urldefense.com/v3/__https=
:/csrc.nist.gov/projects/cryptographic-module-validation-program/modules-in=
-process/modules-in-process-list__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!cn7ZZT_-25LDzb5jpUAc5H92a=
_1XhJ9WnBHNw1kBQDMtUMzLCNRxm_pv4KY3dlrtuGtkYbjejIR6Wae8qs7qagtrcis$">https:=
//csrc.nist.gov/projects/cryptographic-module-validation-program/modules-in=
-process/modules-in-process-list</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quo=
t;,sans-serif;color:#1B1B1B;border:solid #DDDDDD 1.0pt;padding:4.0pt"><br>
OpenSSL FIPS Provider<br>
The OpenSSL Corporation&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<ul type=3D"disc">
<li class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"color:#1B1B1B;mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-=
margin-bottom-alt:auto;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1">
<span style=3D"font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;,sans-serif;border:so=
lid #DDDDDD 1.0pt;padding:4.0pt">OpenSSL Corporation<o:p></o:p></span></li>=
<li class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"color:#1B1B1B;mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-=
margin-bottom-alt:auto;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;box-sizing: inherit">
<span style=3D"font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;,sans-serif;border:so=
lid #DDDDDD 1.0pt;padding:4.0pt"><a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]"=
>[email protected]</a><o:p></o:p></span></li><li class=3D"MsoNormal" =
style=3D"color:#1B1B1B;mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;m=
so-list:l0 level1 lfo1;box-sizing: inherit">
<span style=3D"font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;,sans-serif;border:so=
lid #DDDDDD 1.0pt;padding:4.0pt">Voice: 877-673-6775<o:p></o:p></span></li>=
</ul>
</div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quo=
t;,sans-serif;color:#1B1B1B;border:solid #DDDDDD 1.0pt;padding:4.0pt"><br>
FIPS 140-3<br>
Pending Review (11/25/2025)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quo=
t;,sans-serif;color:#1B1B1B">For the above OpenSSL FIPS validation is in pr=
ogress, that means here with OpenSSL 3.5.4 which contains the PQC related a=
lgorithms.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quo=
t;,sans-serif;color:#1B1B1B">so once this get the approval then all the PQC=
 algorithms which are part of this OpenSSL will be FIPS 140-3 compliant and=
 as i mentioned earlier then we can&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quo=
t;,sans-serif;color:#1B1B1B">take this OpenSSL 3.5.4 FIPS provider and bund=
le in our application to claim both PQC and FIPS compliant ?</span><o:p></o=
:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quo=
t;,sans-serif;color:#1B1B1B">please correct me if our understanding is wron=
g</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-family:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quo=
t;,sans-serif;color:#1B1B1B">Thanks,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style=3D"font-f=
amily:&quot;Source Sans Pro&quot;,sans-serif;color:#1B1B1B">Raghu</span><o:=
p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">On Wednesday, 15 April 2026 at 22:12:06 UTC+5:30 Rag=
hu Chidambaram wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style=3D"border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0c=
m 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">Thanks Martin Bonner and Neil,<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">Thanks for the information.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">&nbsp;then until 3.5.4 is approved, FIPS and PQC are=
 mutually exclusive with OpenSSL (and FIPS is impossible between Sep 2026 a=
nd the approval of 3.5.4).<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">- [Raghu] so both are mutually exclusive if i unders=
tood correctly.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">These are supported currently only by the 3.5.4 FIPS=
 provider and later versions.&nbsp; Currently 3.5.4 is undergoing review wi=
th our lab and NIST:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">-[Raghu] I have little confusion here, when we are t=
alkin about the OpenSSL version 3.5.4 is undergoing review means the FIPS p=
rovider ( fips modules) inside that 3.5.4 version which also contains the S=
SL and Crypto libraries am i correct.
 Just like OpenSSL 3.0.9 got FIPS 140-2 , OpenSSL 3.1.2 version got FIPS 14=
0-3 , similarly OpenSSL 3.5.4 is going for CMVP validation and it will be 1=
40-3 compliant or some other FIPS compliant?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">PQC algorithms approved by FIPS include FIPS 203 (ML=
-KEM), FIPS 204 (ML-DSA) and FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA)<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">-[Raghu] only above 3 algorithms are FIPS approved a=
s of today? is that correct statement.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">FIPS and PQC are definitely&nbsp;_not_ mutually excl=
usive, you can definitely&nbsp;use both PQC algorithms and be FIPS-140-3 co=
mpliant.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">- [Raghu] we have release our application to all the=
 products/customer in Dell saying that we are FIPS compliant, i m part of D=
ell Organization previously we were using OpenSSL 1.0.2 FIPS version which =
was supported by OpenSSL team for
 few years later we moved to OpenSSL 3.0.x and now we are at OpenSSL 3.5.5 =
version in our application.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">so we cant use few algorithms which are PQC and few =
which are FIPS 140-3 and claim for both? is that correct? we want to claim =
FIPS 140-3 as of now which is in progress and if we move to PQC safe algori=
thms ( somehow not sure as of now)
 then we cant claim for FIPS 140-3 right?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">Thanks,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">Raghu<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">On Wednesday, 15 April 2026 at 19:42:45 UTC+5:30 Mar=
tin Bonner wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style=3D"border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0c=
m 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
<div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">My reading of the original email is that Raghu=E2=80=99s organizat=
ion achieved FIPS compliance by using the FIPS-approved OpenSSL provider.&n=
bsp; This is good, because I would have said that
 it while it is touch-and-go whether OpenSSL 3.5.4 is going to be FIPS-appr=
oved before Sep 2026, it is very unlikely that a submission made today by R=
aghu=E2=80=99s organization would be approved by then.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">There is also a question of whether Raghu=E2=80=99s organization n=
eeds =E2=80=9CFIPS approved=E2=80=9D, or whether =E2=80=9CFIPS pending=E2=
=80=9D is good enough.&nbsp; It is almost inconceivable to me that 3.5.4 wo=
n=E2=80=99t be
<i>eventually</i> approved, it=E2=80=99s just a matter of bureaucracy.&nbsp=
; OTOH, if FIPS approved is a contractual requirement (e.g. because the US =
Government is a customer), then until 3.5.4 is approved, FIPS and PQC are m=
utually exclusive with OpenSSL (and FIPS is impossible
 between Sep 2026 and the approval of 3.5.4).<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">On =E2=80=9CPQC equivalents for classical algorithms=E2=80=9D, don=
=E2=80=99t forget that if you are using AES128 you need to switch to AES256=
 (but AES256 is already considered acceptable).<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p>
<table class=3D"MsoNormalTable" border=3D"0" cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=
=3D"0" style=3D"border-collapse:collapse">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width=3D"265" valign=3D"top" style=3D"width:198.8pt;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0=
cm 5.4pt">
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:2.7pt=
;text-autospace:none">
<span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:14.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial Blac=
k&quot;,sans-serif;color:#6F2176">Martin Bonner</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt">&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p>
<div style=3D"border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm =
0cm 0cm">
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto"><b><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quo=
t;Calibri&quot;,sans-serif">From:</span></b><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"f=
ont-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,sans-serif"> Neil
 Horman &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt=
; <br>
<b>Sent:</b> 15 April 2026 14:53<br>
<b>To:</b> Raghu Chidambaram &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">pc=
[email protected]</a>&gt;<br>
<b>Cc:</b> openssl-users &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">opens=
[email protected]</a>&gt;<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [EXTERNAL] Re: OpenSSL and PQC/FIPS support</span><o:p></o:=
p></p>
</div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto"><span style=3D"font-size:1.0pt;color:white">Raghu- PQC algorithms =
approved by FIPS include FIPS 203 (ML-KEM), FIPS 204 (ML-DSA) and FIPS 205 =
(SLH-DSA). These are supported currently
 only by the 3.</span><span style=3D"font-size:1.0pt;font-family:&quot;Aria=
l&quot;,sans-serif;color:white">=E2=80=8A</span><span style=3D"font-size:1.=
0pt;color:white">5.</span><span style=3D"font-size:1.0pt;font-family:&quot;=
Arial&quot;,sans-serif;color:white">=E2=80=8A</span><span style=3D"font-siz=
e:1.0pt;color:white">4
 FIPS provider and later versions. Currently 3.</span><span style=3D"font-s=
ize:1.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,sans-serif;color:white">=E2=80=8A</=
span><span style=3D"font-size:1.0pt;color:white">5.</span><span style=3D"fo=
nt-size:1.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,sans-serif;color:white">=E2=80=
=8A</span><span style=3D"font-size:1.0pt;color:white">4
 is undergoing review with our lab and</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">Raghu-<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;PQC algorithms approved by FIPS include FIPS 2=
03 (ML-KEM), FIPS 204 (ML-DSA) and FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA).&nbsp; These are supp=
orted currently only by the 3.5.4 FIPS provider and later
 versions.&nbsp; Currently 3.5.4 is undergoing review with our lab and NIST=
:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto"><a href=3D"https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/csrc.nist.gov/projec=
ts/cryptographic-module-validation-program/modules-in-process/modules-in-pr=
ocess-list__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!bZut-uZon_VIGux_15WX7wQQlDCz2htlQH38Q5r93kD1Fyy=
fFNGBYigp6MnOcctxqdvCUvGlZbPhhLscJuPv$" target=3D"_blank">https://csrc.nist=
.gov/projects/cryptographic-module-validation-program/modules-in-process/mo=
dules-in-process-list</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">FIPS and PQC are definitely&nbsp;_not_ mutually exclusive, you can=
 definitely&nbsp;use both PQC algorithms and be FIPS-140-3 compliant.&nbsp;=
 The only current barrier is that our provider has
 not yet been certified by NIST.&nbsp; That need not be a barrier for you h=
owever, if you are planning on doing a full submission of openssl through y=
our own lab (though the time effort on that is constrained by your lab and =
NIST).<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">Neil<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 9:43<span style=3D"font-family:&quot;Arial=
&quot;,sans-serif">=E2=80=AF</span>AM Raghu Chidambaram &lt;<a href=3D"mail=
to:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style=3D"border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0c=
m 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-=
bottom:5.0pt">
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">Hi Team,<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">Our organization is planning to go for PQC support so that applica=
tion is quantum safe.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">we are already FIPS 140-2 compliant and we are also in the process=
 of making it FIPS 140-3 compliant as 140-2 will be sunset by Sep 2026.<o:p=
></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">FIPS<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">- Our application is FIPS 140-2 and with FIPS provider 3.0.9. We m=
ade this possible with the help of lot of to and fro discussions over the O=
penSSL Forum for good amount of time
 :) :) .<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">For 140-3 we did analysis and understood that with OpenSSL version=
 say 3.5.x we need to bundle the FIPS provider version 3.1.2 ( 140-3 compli=
ant ) instead of 3.0.9( 140-2) compliant.
 Hope this is correct.<br>
<br>
PQC<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">- For PQC we just started analysis and checking which all algorith=
ms we need to use in order to make it PQC compliant. As part of this we wan=
t to understand which of OpenSSL supports
 PQC and is there any doc / list which conveys like from algorithm A we nee=
d to move to algorithm, means how to migrate from current set to PQC safe s=
et is what we are checking mainly.&nbsp;<br>
<br>
- one more point what we understood from the discussions internally and wit=
h the teams who are handling inside our organization that FIPS and PQC cant=
 go hand in hand, like if we are in FIPS 140-3 version we cant claim for PQ=
C as algo's are different and if
 we are going to be PQC safe then we can't claim FIPS 140-3 support, is thi=
s correct statement? or our assumption is wrong?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">Need your help and inputs to proceed on these aspects&nbsp;<o:p></=
o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">Thank you,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">Raghu<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">--
<br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;openssl-users&quot; group.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to
<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]<=
/a>.<br>
To view this discussion visit <a href=3D"https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:=
/groups.google.com/a/openssl.org/d/msgid/openssl-users/9d605db8-9220-491c-9=
424-12b42ed92948n*40openssl.org?utm_medium=3Demail&amp;utm_source=3Dfooter_=
_;JQ!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!bZut-uZon_VIGux_15WX7wQQlDCz2htlQH38Q5r93kD1FyyfFNGBYigp=
6MnOcctxqdvCUvGlZbPhhPVv707z$" target=3D"_blank">
https://groups.google.com/a/openssl.org/d/msgid/openssl-users/9d605db8-9220=
-491c-9424-12b42ed92948n%40openssl.org</a>.<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">--
<br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;openssl-users&quot; group.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to
<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]<=
/a>.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-a=
lt:auto">To view this discussion visit
<a href=3D"https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/groups.google.com/a/openssl.o=
rg/d/msgid/openssl-users/CAJbOq16tR2n_U1tWtzbCUzt57PjEZQbiJRjvM-3vPQ3gkrGyX=
A*40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=3Demail&amp;utm_source=3Dfooter__;JQ!!FJ-Y8qC=
qXTj2!bZut-uZon_VIGux_15WX7wQQlDCz2htlQH38Q5r93kD1FyyfFNGBYigp6MnOcctxqdvCU=
vGlZbPhhA0Qq6iv$" target=3D"_blank">
https://groups.google.com/a/openssl.org/d/msgid/openssl-users/CAJbOq16tR2n_=
U1tWtzbCUzt57PjEZQbiJRjvM-3vPQ3gkrGyXA%40mail.gmail.com</a>.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"margin-bottom:12.0pt"><i>Any email and file=
s/attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the in=
dividual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this message has been sen=
t to you in error, you must not copy,
 distribute or disclose of the information it contains. <u>Please notify En=
trust immediately and delete the message from your system.</u></i><o:p></o:=
p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;openssl-users&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:openssl-users+unsubscribe-MCmKBN63+BlAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org">openssl-us=
[email protected]</a>.<br />
To view this discussion visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/a/openss=
l.org/d/msgid/openssl-users/PH3PPF7A88A980AD6C9D8A344703C2626A2F3232%40PH3P=
PF7A88A980A.namprd11.prod.outlook.com?utm_medium=3Demail&utm_source=3Dfoote=
r">https://groups.google.com/a/openssl.org/d/msgid/openssl-users/PH3PPF7A88=
A980AD6C9D8A344703C2626A2F3232%40PH3PPF7A88A980A.namprd11.prod.outlook.com<=
/a>.<br />

--_000_PH3PPF7A88A980AD6C9D8A344703C2626A2F3232PH3PPF7A88A980A_--