Re: GD doesn't always accept revocations

Jason Harris <[email protected]> Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:25:42 -0500

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.encryption.pgp.keyserver-folk,gmane.comp.gnu.gnupg.users
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 06:29:28PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:38:46PM -0500, Jason Harris wrote:

> > If this isn't already self-evident to them...
> 
> Maybe it is, and maybe it isn't.  If you just want to complain, then I
> guess you're all set.  If you want something actually fixed you should
> tell them.

I wasn't complaining.  I had a valid question about why the GD wasn't
accepting a 0x20 signature and we had a productive conversation about it.
I think this particular keyholder DTRT by sending their revoked key to
a keyserver that would accept it, and I hope more people read this thread
and come to the same conclusion.

-- 
Jason Harris           |  NIC:  JH329, PGP:  This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
[email protected] _|_ web:  http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/
          Got photons?   (TM), (C) 2004

_______________________________________________
pgp-keyserver-folk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.kjsl.com/mailman/listinfo/pgp-keyserver-folk

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 309 B)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iJoEARECAFoFAkIKuBVTGGh0dHA6Ly9rZXlzZXJ2ZXIua2pzbC5jb206ODAvcGtz
L2xvb2t1cD9vcD1nZXQmc2VhcmNoPTB4RDM5REEwRTMmd2VoYXZleW91bm93PXRy
dWUACgkQSypIl9OdoOMRGQCeNuAO0T6kLVAxTddD4pmFBxDckl8AnR0A+1qiZx3l
aHsg8zHykNA9/+Y5
=k5DK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----