Re: Shouldn't keyservers store and provide subkeys?

On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 04:20:02PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 06:34:58PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:

> > That keyserver as well as all other servers running the old HKS
> > software are broken.  YOu should move away from that keyserver and use
> > an SKS one (e.g. random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de) or at least those at
> > subkeys.pgp.net.
> > 
> > BTW, to avoid answering these questions over and over, should we just
> > setup working keyservers under the gnupg.net domain?  It seems the old
> > and broken pgp.net servers will never vanish.
> 
> I'm all for it.  It would be nice to point people to a keyserver set
> that works properly with everything: multiple subkeys, photo IDs, and
> MR output.  At the moment, this is just SKS servers.

You (gnupg.{org,net}) should run your own keyserver(s) rather than
creating yet another DNS RR name.  I'd be happy to get you going
with either an email feed from pks or an SKS feed.

-- 
Jason Harris           |  NIC:  JH329, PGP:  This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
[email protected] _|_ web:  http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/
          Got photons?   (TM), (C) 2004

_______________________________________________
pgp-keyserver-folk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.kjsl.com/mailman/listinfo/pgp-keyserver-folk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iJoEARECAFoFAkJDNNBTGGh0dHA6Ly9rZXlzZXJ2ZXIua2pzbC5jb206ODAvcGtz
L2xvb2t1cD9vcD1nZXQmc2VhcmNoPTB4RDM5REEwRTMmd2VoYXZleW91bm93PXRy
dWUACgkQSypIl9OdoOPCswCgqxjoOXLm3VneoWPEseSz/Oh+NW0AoJA2QUvv607M
c0EWjEzwiffWqMRX
=MgSq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----