Re: Shouldn't keyservers store and provide subkeys?
Jonathan McDowell <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Mar 2005 22:49:08 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.pgp.keyserver-folk,gmane.comp.gnu.gnupg.users |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[I'm guessing the original mail was on gnupg-users; I'm not on that list though I do read pgp-keyserver-folk.] On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 04:44:49PM -0500, Jason Harris wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 04:20:02PM -0500, David Shaw wrote: > > I'm all for it. It would be nice to point people to a keyserver set > > that works properly with everything: multiple subkeys, photo IDs, and > > MR output. At the moment, this is just SKS servers. onak should handle all of these; if anyone has examples of keys that it doesn't deal with then please do let me know the details. I appreciate that the.earth.li [wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net] is probably the only public keyserver running the code, but I do try to react to any bug reports I receive. It can be found at: http://www.earth.li/projectpurple/progs/onak.html which also has details of the arch repository. J. -- 101 things you can't have too much of : 41 - Tea. This .sig brought to you by the letter E and the number 3 Product of the Republic of HuggieTag _______________________________________________ pgp-keyserver-folk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.kjsl.com/mailman/listinfo/pgp-keyserver-folk
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCQ0Pk8b1L5FtDA2cRAiIoAJ9esxhcfEzFLkxhEBPl+66FvPjsZQCgiUtA dWdsxLNKND+bl3DkBSE6t6M= =5fb+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----