Re: healthy installation on os x does not connect at some locations

Anton Grigoriev <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.file-systems.arla.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I want to thank once more everyone who responded my mail. I am  
contacting my sysadmin to see if he can fix the firewall.

Meanwhile, I found that the presence of the client connection from  
pdc to my Mac:7001 does not affect the work of arla afs. I made a NAT  
rule at home and opened OS X to listen on 7001, so that /usr/openafs/ 
sbin/rxdebug from pdc sees my Mac. I found that nothing changed in my  
(working) afs connection.

Sincerely
Anton

On Sep 29, 2006, at 13:41, Anton Grigoriev wrote:

> Thank you very mach, Harald!
> It was very useful.
>
> What I found is that
> 1) If I can connect to pdc, then I have response on rxdebug towards  
> sculpin like
> AFS version:  OpenAFS 1.4.0 built  2006-03-06
> otherwise I have no responce
> get version call failed with code -1, errno 0
>
> 2) I never have any response backwards, i.e. from lise to my Mac  
> 7001 , even if I can connect to afs.
> get version call failed with code -1, errno 0
> 2.a) I will change that at home via opening 7001 in OS X firewall  
> _and_ setting appropriate NAT rule in the router.  Still, I do not  
> (yet ) see the effect on connectivity. It works without a client.
>
> 3) I have a) UU firewall ??? b) department's firewall c) OS X  
> firewall. d) more firewalls???
> NB the setting called 'location' is always the same so computer  
> thinks it is in the same place, but with DHCP, so that IP is  
> different.
> My OS X firewall is set to reject udp in stelth mode. Changing this  
> does not change connectability.
> 3.a) System administrators are payed for being paranoid. For this  
> reason all laptops at my dept are connected OUTSIDE of the dept  
> firewall, so that they will not kill the system inside.
> This leaves the Q if anyone at UU can mount afs from pdc. It also  
> could be that OS X firewall feels the change off location  
> somehow ... Ore there is yet another firewall in between. I will  
> find out.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Anton
>
>
> On Sep 28, 2006, at 15:12, Harald Barth wrote:
>
>>
>>> My guess is that there is a firewall blocking the ports that AFS  
>>> uses (udp
>>> 7000-7003 or so).  You could try running /usr/arla/bin/rxdebug  
>>> against
>>> those ports on some interesting hosts (like  
>>> {anna,lise,houting}.pdc.kth.se)
>>> to see if you get any packets through at all.  Try rxdebug at  
>>> home or PDC
>>> and compare results.
>>
>> At PDC rxdebug is in /usr/openafs/sbin/rxdebug
>>
>> The following commands should give output
>> from your MAC:
>>
>>   Against one of the AFS DB servers:
>>
>>   rxdebug anna.pdc.kth.se 7007 -version
>>   rxdebug anna.pdc.kth.se 7003 -version
>>
>>   Against the fileserver your $HOME is on:
>>
>>   rxdebug sculpin.pdc.kth.se 7000 -version
>>   rxdebug sculpin.pdc.kth.se 7005 -version
>>
>> The following command should give output
>> when executed on PDC:
>>
>>   /usr/openafs/sbin/rxdebug angr.Fysik.UU.SE 7001 -version
>>
>> The ports are as follows (all UDP):
>>
>> 7007: AFS Volume location database
>> 7003: AFS Users and groups database
>> 7000: File server (files)
>> 7005: File server (volumes)
>> 7001: Client
>>
>
>>> Wrong. I mixed up the numbers.
>>>
>>> The ports are as follows (all UDP):
>>>
>>> 7003: AFS Volume location database
>>> 7002: AFS Users and groups database
>>> 7000: File server (files)
>>> 7005: File server (volumes)
>>> 7001: Client
>>>
>>> And 7007 is bos but not neccessary for you.
>
>
>> So for this to work, the firewall has to be opened for these ports.
>>
>> If your sysadmin has any questions about AFS or firewalls etc, point
>> him to the PDC support.
>>
>> Harald.
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.