Re: Simple patch for pts.c

Rasmus Kaj <[email protected]> writes:
> In appl/pts/pts.c, the chown_cmd function, there is a mistake in
> argument ordering, so pts chown fail.
> 
> There is a patch in /afs/kth.se/home/k/a/kaj/Public/patch-ptc.c
> 
Thanks. The original mistake was most likely in that this is the only place
where the host argument was added after 'cell', so I'd prefer just
reordering the command's arguments for consistency. Would that cause any
problems (like widely deployed arla-dependent scripts for example)?

It would also make it slightly less different from the OpenAFS version,
which is good.

/t