AFS and 'afs' URI scheme

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <[email protected]> Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:51:20 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.comp.file-systems.arla.general
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============1545619878==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="------------090603050503020904050406"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------090603050503020904050406
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello all,

I am writing to request some information regarding AFS and its current 
implementations.  I hope this is the right list to ask.

So my question is whether the latest versions of current AFS 
implementation still use 'afs' URI scheme.  The 'afs' URI scheme can be 
found mentioned as reserved for further standardization in RFC 1738 
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1738) dated December 1994, but there is 
no any definition of the scheme's syntax/semantics.

Currently the 'afs' URI scheme is registered by IANA as Provisional with 
reference to RFC 1738.  In the previous year there were some some 
discussions in the IETF regarding what should be done with it.  However 
there was no consensus on any actions; two were proposed - move the 
scheme to Historical category or remain it as is.  I'd like to hear the 
opinion of AFS experts.

Thank you in advance,
Mykyta Yevstifeyev

--------------090603050503020904050406
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUTF=
-8">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor=3D"#ffffff" text=3D"#000000">
    <font size=3D"-1"><big>Hello all,<br>
        <br>
        I am writing to request some information regarding AFS and its
        current implementations.=C2=A0 I hope this is the right list to a=
sk.<br>
        <br>
        So my question is whether the latest versions of current AFS
        implementation still use 'afs' URI scheme.=C2=A0 The 'afs' URI sc=
heme
        can be found mentioned as reserved for further standardization
        in RFC 1738 (<a class=3D"moz-txt-link-freetext"
          href=3D"http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1738">http://tools.ietf.o=
rg/html/rfc1738</a>)
        dated December 1994, but there is no any definition of the
        scheme's syntax/semantics.=C2=A0 <br>
        <br>
        Currently the 'afs' URI scheme is registered by IANA as
        Provisional with reference to RFC 1738.=C2=A0 In the previous yea=
r
        there were some some discussions in the IETF regarding what
        should be done with it.=C2=A0 However there was no consensus on a=
ny
        actions; two were proposed - move the scheme to Historical
        category or remain it as is.=C2=A0 I'd like to hear the opinion o=
f
        AFS experts.<br>
        <br>
        Thank you in advance,<br>
        Mykyta Yevstifeyev</big></font>
  </body>
</html>

--------------090603050503020904050406--

--===============1545619878==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Arla-drinkers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.stacken.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/arla-drinkers

--===============1545619878==--