Re: Process pointer PID panics

Tomas Olsson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.file-systems.arla.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[email protected] writes:
> It seems a simple patch for such a harrowing journey through kernel
> internals trying to pinpoint this.
> 
They always do, don't they.

> If a client application (ie: not arlad) opens the /dev/nnpfs0 device
> before daemon-ifying itself, the (chan->proc) pointer will point into
> the process struct from the starting shell.
> 
Any particular reason why one would do such a thing?

> +    if (chan->proc == NULL || chan->proc != nnpfs_get_proc(uiop))
>  	chan->proc = nnpfs_get_proc(uiop);
>  
Apple demands that procs are released too.  It's not hard at all, I just
want to understand why we want this.

thanks
        /t
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.