Re: [AVFS] lufis not working on locasefs
Timothee Besset <[email protected]> Mon, 07 Jun 2004 01:19:24 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.avfs.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yeah it works with lufs. I recompiled lufs cvs and I'm back to using
that ( I use a locasefs on top of an sshfs ). I'm not sure lufis is a
good thing really. It's a bit pointless when you can use lufs directly
for the same thing. If the filesystems were just transferred to the fuse
source tree and made to work fully there, then it would probably be of
greater interest.
TTimo
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>>lufis fs=locasefs ~/test -s
>>
>>$ ls ~/test
>>(get_reference_path)local_p: /
>>(get_reference_path)early exit
>>(get_reference_path)path: /
>>(get_reference_path)local_p: /
>>(get_reference_path)early exit
>>ls: /home/timo/test: No such file or directory
>>
>>
>
>strace shows that locasefs does a stat(""), which returns ENOENT. The
>path supplied to the locasefs_stat() function is "/", which is OK, so
>it seems like locasefs is doing something strange. Does it work with
>LUFS?
>
>Thanks,
>Miklos
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
>>From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one
>installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
>evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
>_______________________________________________
>Avf-user mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avf-user
>
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one
installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504