librvm.so vs. librvmlwp.so ?

Adam Goode <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:06:35 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.file-systems.coda.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig29C316F1A773E0458B97E4E7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

Is there any real difference between librvm.so and librvmlwp.so ?
It looks like these two libraries are 99% identical except for a little
code in the log and util functions.

Is there any reason to have both libraries installed at once? Can this
just be a compile-time option?

I am looking at packaging Coda for possible inclusion in Fedora Extras,
and this came up. Can I just build librvm.so (and librds.so) with LWP
support and be done?



Thanks,

Adam


--------------enig29C316F1A773E0458B97E4E7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFCLkulenB4PQRJawRAqy0AJ9ijuzZ2Tj89H1EIpei2ERgJN3eiwCfVSAL
4pancJFEEhMz3F6i+LpBcsA=
=FxgN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig29C316F1A773E0458B97E4E7--