librvm.so vs. librvmlwp.so ?
Adam Goode <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:06:35 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.coda.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig29C316F1A773E0458B97E4E7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Is there any real difference between librvm.so and librvmlwp.so ? It looks like these two libraries are 99% identical except for a little code in the log and util functions. Is there any reason to have both libraries installed at once? Can this just be a compile-time option? I am looking at packaging Coda for possible inclusion in Fedora Extras, and this came up. Can I just build librvm.so (and librds.so) with LWP support and be done? Thanks, Adam --------------enig29C316F1A773E0458B97E4E7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFCLkulenB4PQRJawRAqy0AJ9ijuzZ2Tj89H1EIpei2ERgJN3eiwCfVSAL 4pancJFEEhMz3F6i+LpBcsA= =FxgN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig29C316F1A773E0458B97E4E7--